3 ms·
I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.
by SilverElfin 9mo ago
I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.
- ben_w 9mo agoI think that line of argument would work in my country of birth, the UK, but I don't think it works in the USA.
- terminalshort 9mo agoYou do not lose your right to free speech by providing contractual services to the US government.