3 ms·
> probably only be the best alternative on a densely packed island So Manhattan or the San Francisco Peninsula? I suspect the refusal to kowtow to car owners
by hamdingers 9mo ago
> probably only be the best alternative on a densely packed island
So Manhattan or the San Francisco Peninsula?
I suspect the refusal to kowtow to car owners and the density are interrelated. Tokyo is more dense, in (small?) part, because there is far less space consumed by inanimate appliances.
- shiroiuma 9mo agoNo, it's in very, very large part due to this. You can see it not just walking around, but especially when you go up in one of the tall buildings or in SkyTree tower and look at the city from above: you can't see any parking lots anywhere, and most of the roads are pretty small (there's some large boulevards, but not that many). Compare to any American city that was built up after the rise of the automobile and it's staggering how much space is wasted on cars in those cities.
- mc3301 9mo agoCovered multi-story parking lots.
- PearlRiver 9mo agoAnd those cost money. That is the crux here. Free parking is frankly insane. It became untenable in Amsterdam as early as the 1960s when most people could afford a car. If you want trees, a sidewalk and bike lanes something has got to give.