5 ms·

> But maybe I'm misunderstanding? If so, I don't know what I'm missing You're apparently missing the two points I made in the post you are replying to, or at t

> But maybe I'm misunderstanding? If so, I don't know what I'm missing You're apparently missing the two points I made in the post you are replying to, or at the very least you're not responding to them. By which I don't mean to say they are necessarily valid points.

godelski 8mo ago
My bad, I was confused given the context of the comment you responded to. Maybe I should quote the next line instead? You are licensed to use the source code in Admin Tools and Configuration Files (server/templates/, server/i18n/, server/public/, webapp/ and all subdirectories thereof) under the Apache License v2.0. So I read Apache (OSS): |- server/ | |- i18n/ | |- public/ | |- templates/ |- webapp/ Not Apache (pay us/not OSS): |- api/ |- e2e-tests/ |- server/ | |- bin/ | |- build/ | |- cmd/ | |- enterprise/ | |- scripts/ | |- Makefile | |- path.go | |- this is not a complete list but you get the point |- tools/ Part of the code is open source. Part of the code is source available (source visible). Again, I am open to misunderstanding but that's my read.