4 ms·
Software Development might be dead, but Software Engineering is alive and well. Anyone seriously interfacing with AI code generation can tell you that understa
by SimianSci 8mo ago
Software Development might be dead, but Software Engineering is alive and well.
Anyone seriously interfacing with AI code generation can tell you that understanding how software is composed and architected is, and will continue to be, a requirement to building anything worthwhile.
These systems are impressive but we are a far ways away from "Magical Genie Wishes" as a means of creating software.
- recursivedoubts 8mo agoAnd where do people think "Software Engineers" come from? Do they spring fully formed from Zeus' forehead?
- pjmlp 8mo agoFrom universities, having taken the degree, and in some countries the engineering oath as well. Where graduates learn during a course of three to five years, depending on the country, that Software Engineering isn't only coding.
- 9dev 8mo agoHow can you be so sure of that? We moved from completing the next word in a sentence to hey Claude, build me a SaaS awfully quickly. Are you willing to bet your career on a pace slowdown?
- mmarian 8mo agoIf that were the case, why doesn't Anthropic just spin up their own HR software? https://job-boards.greenhouse.io/anthropic/jobs/5023394008 https://job-boards.greenhouse.io/anthropic/jobs/5023394008
- 9dev 8mo agoBecause it's not their company mission to provide an HR tool. Getting started fast doesn't equate to being done somehow; every piece of software still is a liability that requires ongoing maintenance and continued development. I don't believe everyone will just suddenly start to replace SaaS tools with agent-built versions of them, because economically, that doesn't make sense: Even when we gloss over all human work still required in collaboration with agents, the tokens alone required to build a sufficiently complex system are more expensive over the long term than buying SaaS seats. So there's that.