3 ms·
That’s interesting, how does hard-to-fire law combine with a company that needs to have layoffs?
by mixmastamyk 9mo ago
That’s interesting, how does hard-to-fire law combine with a company that needs to have layoffs?
- menaerus 9mo agoI guess it works for companies which are not part of the union?
- Ylpertnodi 9mo ago"The union" should be "a union", of which, companies are rarely a part of ie zero. Their workforce may be a member of a union, some equals in grade may belong to different unions.
- menaerus 9mo agoThank you for your generous correction but you could rather address the point I was trying to make.
- yobbo 9mo agoHard-to-fire typically means only specific and provable reasons are valid. "Shrinking the org" is a valid reason.