3 ms·
I agree with you partly. The benefits are great & fairly above international norms. But I do not agree with the "firing protection" anymore. Last year alone I s
by rockyj 8mo ago
I agree with you partly. The benefits are great & fairly above international norms. But I do not agree with the "firing protection" anymore. Last year alone I saw thousands let go in Berlin in fairly large organizations like neobanks for example. I myself saw my previous employer let go of 30% of the staff over the year. A simple Google search of - "Berlin IT firings 2025" will give you a picture.
- mixmastamyk 8mo agoThat’s interesting, how does hard-to-fire law combine with a company that needs to have layoffs?
- menaerus 8mo agoI guess it works for companies which are not part of the union?
- Ylpertnodi 8mo ago"The union" should be "a union", of which, companies are rarely a part of ie zero. Their workforce may be a member of a union, some equals in grade may belong to different unions.
- menaerus 8mo agoThank you for your generous correction but you could rather address the point I was trying to make.
- yobbo 8mo agoHard-to-fire typically means only specific and provable reasons are valid. "Shrinking the org" is a valid reason.