3 ms·
I'm not familiar with either of those apps, but it sounds to me like both break their terms of service. We can agree or disagree about those terms, but that see
by ericmay 9mo ago
I'm not familiar with either of those apps, but it sounds to me like both break their terms of service. We can agree or disagree about those terms, but that seems to me to be the case here, versus Apple banning those apps due to services revenue.
- cyberax 9mo agoWell, yes. That's the point. Apple's ToS are anti-competitive crap.
- ericmay 9mo agoI'm not sure if they are or aren't, but I don't think that is a good argument when the premise was that revenue was preventing categories of apps and services. For example, in both of these apps Apple would still be getting services revenue through in-app purchases and such. Maybe that's not enough and so they construct their terms of service accordingly, but that's still not proof one way or the other, which is why I asked the original question that I had asked. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm not sure there is evidence to support your assertion either.
- cyberax 9mo agoE.g. a PeerTube client with configurable endpoints is impossible under the current AppStore policy. Although Netflix is fine.