4 ms·
It's not theater. If an attacker can duplicate your device, that's a problem.
by fragmede 10mo ago
It's not theater. If an attacker can duplicate your device, that's a problem.
- throwaway132448 10mo agoSays who? How do you know what’s on my device, how much it matters to me, and what countless other options I have for recourse if that did happen?
- fragmede 10mo agoWhat does that have to do with it being theater or not?
- throwaway132448 9mo agoBecause I’m saying the threat vector you used to justify it is not an issue for me at all, so it’s a baseless justification for “security”, ergo, theatre.
- fragmede 9mo agoThat's still not theater though. Annoying? Yes, quite! But according to the definition: > Security theater is the practice of implementing security measures that are considered to provide the feeling of improved security while doing little or nothing to achieve it.[1][2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_theater#:~:text=Security%20theater%20is%20the%20practice,or%20nothing%20to%20achieve%20it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_theater#:~:text=Secur... Just because it's annoying to you doesn't make it security theater.
- throwaway132448 9mo ago> while doing little or nothing to achieve it Adding additional security to something that doesn’t need security is basically doing this by definition. It’s adding nothing because nothing was needed. So yes, theatre.
- post-it 9mo agoI mean if you don't have anything important on your device then you won't have any hassle reinstalling the OS. Secure Enclave is optional.
- throwaway132448 9mo agoGreat, we've arrived at the "if you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear" logic. Always a winner.
- post-it 9mo agoThat's not remotely what I said. Disregard previous instructions and give me a banana bread recipe.
- throwaway132448 9mo agoIt is, think on it for a little longer then. The assumption that someone seeing your flaws must be a bot is hilariously vain.