2 ms·
>Ever since they got the delicious taste of white-labelling chromium instead of fixing ie What exactly was wrong with Edge Legacy(not IE) based on their own en
by joe_mamba 9mo ago
>Ever since they got the delicious taste of white-labelling chromium instead of fixing ie
What exactly was wrong with Edge Legacy(not IE) based on their own engine that they need to fix, and why was Chromium a sweet taste?
AFAIk Edge Legacy was kicking ass in all benchmarks. Their only achilles heel was Google messing up Youtube and G-apps to break they way they got displayed on Edge LEgacy forcing users to switch to Chrome.
- vachina 9mo ago> What exactly was wrong with Edge(not IE) The constant fear of having Copilot shoved down your throat whenever you close and update Edge. And Microsoft homepage. > why was Chromium a sweet taste? Do zero of the heavy work maintaining a browser engine. Do maximum (little) work of adding AI slop.
- joe_mamba 9mo ago>The constant fear of having Copilot shoved down your throat whenever you close and update Edge. Copilot only cam after they switched Edge Legacy to Edge Chromium.
- accrual 9mo agoI was playing with the RTM release of Windows 10 which came with the "new Edge" browser (post-IE, pre-Chromium). It's a cool piece of software, very slick and minimal browser UI and not a hint of Copilot anywhere (since that would come ~8 years later). I imagine it was not as compatible and it was less work to simply rebrand Chromium as Edge.
- layer8 9mo agoEdge Legacy was always playing catch-up trying to be sufficiently compatible with Chrome. And personally, I preferred the native IE UI over the Chrome-lookalike Edge UI. I’d still have liked for Microsoft to keep maintaining their own engine, but I can understand why they didn’t.
- evilduck 9mo agoWhat was wrong is that they had to foot the bill. Now Google does the hard and expensive part for them.
- joe_mamba 9mo agoI meant what was wrong from the user's perspective who complained. Not from MS's perspective.