4 ms·
SCOTUS can only rule on cases presented to it. AFAIK there has not been a relevant case submitted to them.
by zeroonetwothree 9mo ago
SCOTUS can only rule on cases presented to it. AFAIK there has not been a relevant case submitted to them.
- MengerSponge 9mo agoSCOTUS has already ruled on cases that were presented to them and now we're contending with a mad king.
- bsder 9mo agoHow on earth can you say that with a straight face? > Attached to this order is an appendix that identifies 96 court orders that ICE has violated in 74 cases. The extent of ICE’s noncompliance is almost certainly substantially understated. This list is confined to orders issued since January 1, 2026, and the list was hurriedly compiled by extraordinarily busy judges. > ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence. Ref: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230171/gov.uscourts.mnd.230171.10.0_1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230... This is an official filing--facts, not a news report. A judge placed his job on the line and said these things in a written, filed, official ruling. The problem isn't judicial rulings; the problems are petulant bullies who simply ignore the rulings; and completely subservient sycophants who only can say "As you wish, master."