4 ms·
“Burning wood at home produces more pollution than road traffic” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjdne9ke0m1o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjdne9ke0m1o
by 47282847 9mo ago
“Burning wood at home produces more pollution than road traffic” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjdne9ke0m1o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjdne9ke0m1o
“Residential wood-burning is the biggest source of particulate matter and soot/black carbon in Europe” https://www.fern.org/publications-insight/latest-evidence-on-the-destructive-climate-and-health-impact-of-biomass-subsidies-and-wood-burning/ https://www.fern.org/publications-insight/latest-evidence-on...
“domestic wood-burning is the largest source of particulate pollution in the UK. Only 8% of the UK’s homes burn wood, but this accounts for around 21% of the total PM2.5 emissions, whereas all traffic on the UK roads produces 13%” https://medium.com/the-new-climate/why-the-environmental-movement-has-a-blind-spot-for-wood-burning-73a5d0eb2a6b https://medium.com/the-new-climate/why-the-environmental-mov...
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[flagged]
- ornornor 9mo agoYes clearly your anecdote is irrefutable proof.
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[flagged]
- ornornor 9mo agoYou’re the one claiming smoking cigarettes don’t give lung cancer and it’s all a big conspiracy to mess with you. So the onus in on you to show that smoking cigarettes doesn’t cause lung cancer despite the overwhelming amount t of scientific evidence that it does.
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[flagged]
- 47282847 9mo agoDo you really think your aggressive behavior will convince anyone that you’re fine and healthy and it’s just everybody else that isn’t?
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[flagged]
- Aeglaecia 9mo agopresuming your suggestion is correct (that forum goers are indistinguishable from walking echo chambers) , wouldnt screaming at forum goers just end up with a scream being returned right at you ?
- pengaru 9mo ago> I breathe in smoke every day through the copious amount of weed I smoke It shows.
- its_ubuntu 9mo ago[flagged]