4 ms·
Exercise doesn't suck, land use policies generally just don't prioritize good places for the fun kinds of exercise.
by oatmeal1 8mo ago
Exercise doesn't suck, land use policies generally just don't prioritize good places for the fun kinds of exercise.
- JumpCrisscross 8mo agoWho does land use right?
- its_ubuntu 8mo ago[dead]
- defrost 8mo agoI can criticise Australian urban planning for days ... but many visitors to Australia do effuse about how much outdoor recreational space we have and plan for. Eg: Perth's 7km park: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1362227242068763 https://www.facebook.com/reel/1362227242068763 and https://www.tiktok.com/@9newsperth/video/7553237387548134712 https://www.tiktok.com/@9newsperth/video/7553237387548134712 AU Aintree North Recreation Reserve : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5vYNG2eL9g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5vYNG2eL9g Skate parks, woops, river and coastal setbacks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfLa32K74Zw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfLa32K74Zw
- JumpCrisscross 8mo agoYet Australia’s obesity rate is around or worse than that of most of the Western states, Minnesota, Missouri and Illinois [1][2]. I don’t think land-use policies are the main cause. [1] https://data.worldobesity.org/rankings/ https://data.worldobesity.org/rankings/ [2] https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesit...
- defrost 8mo agoFirst link has Australia, the country, at 32% obesity Vs. USofA at %41.6. My only observations, having travelled in both, is that Australia like eveywhere has gotten more urban in past 20 years and I've got a feeling the percentage of Australians significantly past the technical bar of "obese" is very low compared to rates in the US of "well past" "just merely obese". I'm not sure anyone's broken down the obesity quintile demographics.
- ytoawwhra92 8mo agoWhy are you excluding the heaviest 2/3rds of the US population from your comparison?