1. That is simply an onlooker's opinion. 2. It provides no evidence that Iran Int'l is CIA backed. If you're going to provide another link to a random journali

1. That is simply an onlooker's opinion. 2. It provides no evidence that Iran Int'l is CIA backed. If you're going to provide another link to a random journalist making assertions without evidence, save the trouble as it will be just as noncredible