3 ms·
> This has been a rampant problem on Wikipedia always. I can't seem to find any indicator that this has increased recently? Because they're only even investigat
by Wowfunhappy 9mo ago
> This has been a rampant problem on Wikipedia always. I can't seem to find any indicator that this has increased recently? Because they're only even investigating articles flagged as potentially AI. So what's the control baseline rate here?
...y'know, I don't want to be that guy, but this actually seems like something AI could check for, and then flag for human review.
- bjourne 9mo agoYou don't need an LLM to find loads of uncorroborated claims on Wikipedia. See f.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variational_autoencoder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variational_autoencoder Most articles about tech are woefully undersourced.