3 ms·
(Without accepting the premise that it should be acceptable to have to provide any kind of proof...) > Zero knowledge protocols really have no functional revoc
by JoshTriplett 9mo ago
(Without accepting the premise that it should be acceptable to have to provide any kind of proof...)
> Zero knowledge protocols really have no functional revocation mechanism.
None would be needed, you (sadly) only age in one direction, so valid proof would never become invalid proof.
- mrob 9mo ago>valid proof would never become invalid proof Somebody can give their proof of age to another person.
- JoshTriplett 9mo agoAnd? Presentation of someone else's valid credentials is not fixable by any privacy-preserving mechanism. You can set an expiration date in order to rotate them, and they can be fast-rotating. In any case, it's a moot point: the correct amount of required identification is zero.
- Mindwipe 9mo ago> Presentation of someone else's valid credentials is not fixable by any privacy-preserving mechanism. And that is precisely why governments will never implement a privacy-preserving mechanism, which is exactly my point. Compromised tokens would be trivially google-able within a day otherwise.