> That sounds like a lot of over engineering and a good way to never complete the project. Perfect is the enemy of good. Strong disagree. Addressing expectable

> That sounds like a lot of over engineering and a good way to never complete the project. Perfect is the enemy of good. Strong disagree. Addressing expectable failure modes is not over engineering. It's engineering. How do you put together a system without actually thinking through how it fails, and how to prevent those failure scenarios from taking down your whole operation?