3 ms·
It feels like you didn’t read your own link as he somewhat addressed your concern directly. The idea is simply that AI investment is an “up front cost” to futur
by EQmWgw87pw 9mo ago
It feels like you didn’t read your own link as he somewhat addressed your concern directly. The idea is simply that AI investment is an “up front cost” to future improvements. To debate against it you would have to provably explain why you think AI will not advance other technologies whatsoever.
- phtrivier 9mo agoI usually don't try to prove things won't happen. I leave the burden of proof to the salesmen. In this case, they have extraordinary claims, so as the saying goes, I wait for extraordinary proofs. So far they have failed to convince me.