3 ms·
Also to your point: "can't we just encrypt it?" Its someone else's computer. The TPM is controlled by someone else. You can't really process on a machine that
by KaiserPro 9mo ago
Also to your point: "can't we just encrypt it?"
Its someone else's computer. The TPM is controlled by someone else. You can't really process on a machine that has a compromised urandom/TPM
Also the bigger issue is having all your access revoked over night. Thats the bigger fear.
- jgbuddy 9mo agoWhat? Storing encrypted data doesn’t mean you have to encrypt it on hardware you don’t own
- KaiserPro 9mo agoYou're assuming that the data can't be unencrypted, which isn't a given. Also you're not understanding the other risk of the sun king owning, or having leverage over the hosting platform: access. If your access can be removed at an arbitrary point, you your own data and processing, then you're sunk. Sure this is illegal, but thats not the point. Its clear that legal rules are not to be trusted anymore.
- XorNot 9mo agoExactly - it's about availability. If someone with remote access could knock out your business operations, how long would it take to adapt? How much economic cost could that incur, perhaps at a critical time?
- komali2 9mo ago> You can't really process on a machine that has a compromised urandom/TPM Naive question: does zero knowledge proof solutions help with this?
- KaiserPro 9mo agoIf you can process your stuff inside a zero knowledge wrapper then yeah. But most things can't be done like that sadly.