3 ms·
Yeah but the choice isn't "do I spend two weeks on this, or do I spend a lifetime?". It's "I have two weeks, do I spend them making the whole thing with AI, or
by stavros 9mo ago
Yeah but the choice isn't "do I spend two weeks on this, or do I spend a lifetime?". It's "I have two weeks, do I spend them making the whole thing with AI, or 5% of it without?".
- codingminds 9mo agoIf it's inaccurate it's worthless anyhow. It's absolutely no issue to build all the technical and design stuff with AI, but science facts must be science facts and not just AI gibberish presented like facts. What's the benefit of presenting not trustworthy data?
- stavros 9mo agoThat's an entirely different argument, though. Let's not move the goalposts.
- jurgenaut23 9mo agoIt must be me getting old, but definitely 5% of it without, if your goal is to learn something. 5% of thinking about a hard problem is more valuable than 100% of letting it being done by someone else. Especially when the value of the end result is close to zero, since it is now so easy to do and replicate.
- stavros 9mo agoEh, my goal is to make something, personally.