4 ms·
I think the author is mistaking Content Management Systems with something else. Content Management is about content management. I don't quite get his point. I’
by vhf 14y ago
I think the author is mistaking Content Management Systems with something else. Content Management is about content management. I don't quite get his point.
I’m concerned that enabling a writer/journalist/marketing executive to control every aspect of their website
Well, IMO you can't refer to "controlling every aspect" by "content management". If you don't want people to modify the design, use a CMS.
The only part of the Google Ventures homepage that needs to be content managed is the Here’s what we’ve been up to section.
Exactly ! Content Management is for people to manage content.
- zem 14y agohis point is that for static content, the workflow should be [someone generates content] -> [layout person designs a layout optimised for that content]. with a cms, what you get is [someone designs a generic layout] -> [content person stuffs content into it]. fine for, e.g., a "latest news" blog, not so much for page-shaped stuff.