4 ms·
Isn't it strange that Chrome is lagging behind in SVG support?
by th0ma5 14y ago
Isn't it strange that Chrome is lagging behind in SVG support?
- drhowarddrfine 14y agoWhy does anyone think Chrome is lagging behind? http://caniuse.com/#search=svg http://caniuse.com/#search=svg
- Xurinos 14y agoAnd Javascript :( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javascript#Versions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javascript#Versions
- OriginalSyn 14y agoThat chart is misleading. V8 supports (and has supported it for a long time) the vast majority of ES5. Since version 13 it's supported every ES5 features with the exception of Zero-width chars in identifiers, and I don't know when, but it was implemented somewhere between 16 and 23. http://kangax.github.com/es5-compat-table/ http://kangax.github.com/es5-compat-table/
- timvandevelde 14y agoWebkit does support SVG filters but there is a bug which prevents displaying the filters when embedded in HTML.
- molf 14y agoYeah, Webkit support is disappointing. As mentioned in the article that is mostly because of a bug that prevents many effects from being rendered when used in an HTML document. Opening SVG files in a new window will render those effects correctly. But because no user will ever do that those effects are effectively broken.
- jarek-foksa 14y agoFilters render just fine for me in embedded SVG files (I'm using direct embedding via <svg> tag in HTML5 documents). Not all primitives are fully implemented, but performance is definitely better than in Firefox. IE9 does not support filter effects at all, I don't see how WebKit is "lagging" here.