3 ms·
To me, this reads like a profusion of empirical experiments without any cohesive direction or desire towards deeper understanding.
by abetusk 9mo ago
To me, this reads like a profusion of empirical experiments without any cohesive direction or desire towards deeper understanding.
- scrubs 9mo agoYah Stephen Wolfram is too often grandiose thereby missing the hard edges. But in this case, given how hard P=NP is, it might create wiggle room for progress. Ideally it would have gone on and said in view of lemma/proof/conjecture X, sampling enumerated programs might shine light on ... no doubt that'd be better. But here I'm inclined to let it slide if it's a new attack vector.