> but the full manuscript isn’t out yet. Aww that's bad. I remember years ago they claimed that a bacterium was using arsenic instead of phosphorus - turns ou

> but the full manuscript isn’t out yet. Aww that's bad. I remember years ago they claimed that a bacterium was using arsenic instead of phosphorus - turns out the data they produced was all made up: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1197258 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1197258 This was here in this article most likely not the case, I assume, but still it is bad to talk about the data without having published the article already.