3 ms·
In 2024, Bluesky wrote about their "Stackable Approach to Moderation": https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-12-2024-stackable-moderation https://bsky.social/about
by comex 8mo ago
In 2024, Bluesky wrote about their "Stackable Approach to Moderation":
https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-12-2024-stackable-moderation https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-12-2024-stackable-moderati...
Now in 2026, their transparency report says nothing about stackable moderation or moderation services. I guess nobody is using them, at least not in significant enough volumes that it would have a meaningful effect on the at least not enough for them to have a meaningful effect on the Trust & Safety team's job.
Likewise, they tout "thousands of Personal Data Servers operated by people across the federated AT Protocol network", but that's out of "41.41M users".
It's fine, I guess. It's just not meaningfully decentralized.
- TimorousBestie 8mo ago> I guess nobody is using them, at least not in significant enough volumes that it would have a meaningful effect on the at least not enough for them to have a meaningful effect on the Trust & Safety team's job. It’s spread out over subgroups and niches. I imagine the biggest independent moderation service is blacksky’s, and they’re not exactly best friends with bluesky. I use about five different moderation services, and a handful of independent blocklists. > It's fine, I guess. It's just not meaningfully decentralized. It’s better than the situation on X.