2 ms·
IANAL Fair use usually applies to copying the work or publishing it, or making a dervied work from it (y'know all the thing that the copyright holder usually on
by rmc 14y ago
IANAL Fair use usually applies to copying the work or publishing it, or making a dervied work from it (y'know all the thing that the copyright holder usually only has legal rights to do).
Merely transforming the work yourself and keeping it yourself, wouldn't really count as anything that copyright law has any say over. Since it's not explicitly illegal, it's legal. You don't need 'fair use rights' when you tear up a book in frustration, or your kid scribbles on it. Likewise you can copy your file locally and mangle it if you want.
Copyright law only gives the copyright holder some rights to some things. It's not like they own every single copy of the book/film/file completely.
This is why there was a new law in the USA (the DMCA) which explicitly criminalized breaking DRM. They needed a new law for it.
(However you may enter the territory of hacking a computer system (which is broadly "doing something to a computer that the owner doesn't want").
- fluidcruft 14y ago> You don't need 'fair use rights' when you tear up a book in frustration, or your kid scribbles on it. Wasn't there a big battle lost in Utah by a store where you could take "your" purchased DVDs/VHS and the store would modify/edit them (to improve family friendliness -- also often included removing gay-tolerant elements)? As I recall the directors weren't happy, sued and won.
- regularfry 14y agoAgain, this is not the case in Europe. For instance, format shifting is technically illegal in the UK, even for your own use.