4 ms·

> I presented it initially because this has been what people think: Maybe in some MAGA podcast circles. This has never been more than pure speculation. Again,

> I presented it initially because this has been what people think: Maybe in some MAGA podcast circles. This has never been more than pure speculation. Again, why did you present it as a fact? Let's assume the gun went off. I'm sure the person holding that gun would have noticed that. Why wasn't this reported, especially as it would support their case? This just doesn't make any sense at all. > The first shot is not "clearly seen" as far as I can tell. It very much is. Did you even watch the video I've linked? It shows the very moment the first shot is being fired. Are you seriously claiming it is not the agent who is firing that shot? Again, not even the DHS is disputing that the agent fired the first shot. Stop making a fool of yourself.

kreetx 9mo ago
Here is at least some video infication that Pretti's gun did go off: https://youtu.be/JFSBPEQYSFE?si=hWz6bthbUtOmprhh https://youtu.be/JFSBPEQYSFE?si=hWz6bthbUtOmprhh There'll likely be a deeper investigation and a report to say whether that's true or not.
- spacechild1 9mo ago
  That video does not show anything. Stop being ridiculous! Again, don't you think the agent who took the gun would have noticed that it went off? That's not a serious theory that needs investigating. I have no idea where you're getting all your "information" from, but I can tell you that you need to reflect on your media consumption. You're in a bubble.