4 ms·
I interpreted the article to be about showing the contrast the two perceptions and show how wildly different they could be, rather than to shit on the startups.
by zaptheimpaler 14y ago
I interpreted the article to be about showing the contrast the two perceptions and show how wildly different they could be, rather than to shit on the startups.
Like you said, there are the warm fuzzies too. But thats covered very well by more mainstream-ish sources, so it wouldn't be worth reiterating those.
- ivankirigin 14y agoThe problem is calling the negative story "reality". It would have been better to just call them positive/negative and avoid attributing all these startup's success to bad things.