2 ms·
You would not be guilty of a crime, because that requires intent. But you would be liable for civil damages, because that does not. There are multiple theories
by gamblor956 9mo ago
You would not be guilty of a crime, because that requires intent.
But you would be liable for civil damages, because that does not. There are multiple theories for which to establish liability, but most likely this would be treated as negligence.
- direwolf20 9mo agoWhat was I negligent about?