4 ms·
>A database does not have a mind, and it is not a person. If it could have culpa, then you'd be liable for assault, perhaps murder, if you took it apart. We as
by Muromec 9mo ago
>A database does not have a mind, and it is not a person. If it could have culpa, then you'd be liable for assault, perhaps murder, if you took it apart.
We as a society, for our own convenience can choose to believe that LLM does have a mind and can understand results of it's actions. The second part doesn't really follow. Can you even hurt LLM in a way that is equivalent to murdering a person? Evicting it off my computer isn't necessarily a crime.
It would be good news if the answer was yes, because then we just need to find a convertor of camel amounts to dollar amounts and we are all good.
Can LLM perceive time in a way that allows imposing an equivalent of jail time? Is the LLM I'm running on my computer the same personality as the one running on yours and should I also shut down mine when yours acted up? Do we even need the punishment aspect of it and not just rehabilitation, repentance and retraining?
- Wobbles42 9mo agoThe only hallucination here is the idea that giant equation is a mind.
- Muromec 9mo agoIt's only a hallucination if you are the only one seeing it. Otherwise the line between that, a social construct and a religious belief is a bit blurry.
- cess11 9mo agoThis type of religious gobbledygook is not a sound foundation for regulating state violence.
- Muromec 9mo agoDoes it matter if it's sound? Religious nonsense is in fact a foundation or at least an excuse for state violence most of the time.