4 ms·
This is nonsense. And, not that there's anything wrong with classes, but compilers no longer need to 'insert fake classes' for anonymous functions since Java 8.
by neko-kai 8mo ago
This is nonsense. And, not that there's anything wrong with classes, but compilers no longer need to 'insert fake classes' for anonymous functions since Java 8.
- ActorNightly 8mo agoPretty sure everything in the jvm has to be tied to a class structure by definition.
- neko-kai 8mo agoYes, and? Classes are not inherently bad, hence saying that JVM should not be invested in because its bytecode requires classes is nonsense. re: inline lambdas, they have to be _tied_ to a class, and defined as methods, indeed. But they no longer have to be standalone classes themselves since JDK8