4 ms·
Yes and no. Tons of situations where this is simply not possible, whole traffic goes full allowed speed next to row of parked cars. If somebody unexpectedly pop
by kakacik 9mo ago
Yes and no. Tons of situations where this is simply not possible, whole traffic goes full allowed speed next to row of parked cars. If somebody unexpectedly pops up distracted, its a tragedy guaranteed regardless of driver's skills and experience.
In low traffic of course it can be different. But its unrealistic to expect anybody to drive in expectation that behind every single car passed there may be a child jumping right in front of the car. That can be easily thousands of cars, every day, whole life. Impossible.
We don't read about 99.9% of the cases where even semi decent driver can handle it safely, but rare cases make the news.
- JKCalhoun 9mo agoI kind of drive that way. I slow down, move as far away in my lane from the parked cars as possible. It's certainly what I would expect from a machine that would claim to be as good as the best human driver.
- jobs_throwaway 9mo ago> a machine that would claim to be as good as the best human driver. Does Waymo claim that? If so I haven't seen it. That should of course be the goal, but "better than the average human driver" should be the bar.
- JKCalhoun 9mo agoIf they don't clim that, why would I be interested in their tech?
- Aloisius 9mo agoBecause replacing average drivers with a better than average one would save lives.
- aembleton 9mo agoBecause I'm only an average driver. Definitely not the best and have done no advanced driver training.
- jobs_throwaway 9mo agoBecause we can reduce crashes and fatalities without Waymo being Max Verstappen
- jsrozner 9mo agoI slow down considerably near parked cars. And I try to slow down much earlier approaching intersections where there are parked cars blocking my view of cross walk entries. I need to be able to come to full stop earlier than intersection if there happens to be a pedestrian there.