14 ms·

wait, so I can apply and be honest? Sick! I just poorly misassumed they had classicly archaic interpretations of drugs.

by Quarrelsome 9mo ago

codezero 9mo ago
I don’t have a clearance so someone can correct me, I believe you still have to have not used drugs in the prior year.
- stackghost 9mo ago
  >I don’t have a clearance so someone can correct me Why would you give an answer when by your own statement, you're not knowledgeable? What a strange mindset. >I believe you still have to have not used drugs in the prior year. My own experience does not agree with this speculation.
  - codezero 9mo ago
    Because this is a thing I’ve heard. You can check and verify it yourself. I went to a CIA recruiting event when I was in university and this is what they told me, I assumed it was true but that’s why I caveated it. I shared it so the OP could do their own research since they seem to have even less information. Can you clarify your own experience to help the OP?
- ChrisMarshallNY 9mo ago
  Maybe you can get a security clearance, but don’t cross the border: https://www.wired.com/2007/04/canadian-psycho/ https://www.wired.com/2007/04/canadian-psycho/
volkl48 9mo ago
Current use is still a problem AFAIK (not sure on weed). That said I can confirm that a few years back a friend who had previously used/experimented with a wide variety of substances (EDM scene, psychs), had no trouble getting a clearance. They disclosed all of it, said they weren't currently using it and wouldn't for as long as they were in the job role, passed the drug test, and that was fine. That said, to add to the "lying is a bad idea" point: I believe some of their references were asked about if they'd ever known that friend to have a dependency + if they were aware of any current/very recent use.
- direwolf20 9mo ago
  OC had a point. If you take drugs in the way they are intended to be used, you can say no with a clear conscience. Whether the interviewer will accept that if they later find out you took drugs, I couldn't tell you.

wait, so I can apply and be honest? Sick! I just poorly misassumed they had classicly archaic interpretations of drugs.

codezero 9mo ago

I don’t have a clearance so someone can correct me, I believe you still have to have not used drugs in the prior year.

stackghost 9mo ago
>I don’t have a clearance so someone can correct me Why would you give an answer when by your own statement, you're not knowledgeable? What a strange mindset. >I believe you still have to have not used drugs in the prior year. My own experience does not agree with this speculation.
- codezero 9mo ago
  Because this is a thing I’ve heard. You can check and verify it yourself. I went to a CIA recruiting event when I was in university and this is what they told me, I assumed it was true but that’s why I caveated it. I shared it so the OP could do their own research since they seem to have even less information. Can you clarify your own experience to help the OP?
ChrisMarshallNY 9mo ago
Maybe you can get a security clearance, but don’t cross the border: https://www.wired.com/2007/04/canadian-psycho/ https://www.wired.com/2007/04/canadian-psycho/

volkl48 9mo ago

Current use is still a problem AFAIK (not sure on weed). That said I can confirm that a few years back a friend who had previously used/experimented with a wide variety of substances (EDM scene, psychs), had no trouble getting a clearance. They disclosed all of it, said they weren't currently using it and wouldn't for as long as they were in the job role, passed the drug test, and that was fine. That said, to add to the "lying is a bad idea" point: I believe some of their references were asked about if they'd ever known that friend to have a dependency + if they were aware of any current/very recent use.

direwolf20 9mo ago
OC had a point. If you take drugs in the way they are intended to be used, you can say no with a clear conscience. Whether the interviewer will accept that if they later find out you took drugs, I couldn't tell you.