4 ms·
Conspiracy theory time? Conspiracy theory time. I think the trillion dollar companies have enough money, they can hire people as 'plants'. Okay, before this i
by PlatoIsADisease 9mo ago
Conspiracy theory time? Conspiracy theory time.
I think the trillion dollar companies have enough money, they can hire people as 'plants'.
Okay, before this is marked as crazy talk: Historically this has happened, this isnt a new invention. A company needs to survive, not be ethical. Using third parties give plausible deniability.
I look at the atrocious state of LibreOffice, and I'm pretty sure someone from Microsoft is screwing things up. Might just be a little bit of friction and fake concern over a useful change. Maybe they even find someone who already does this and fund it as a full time job.
I look at Firefox, and I wonder if Google somehow is significantly influencing things there. Google keeps Firefox alive to prevent anti-trust. But they make sure funding is diverted from browser to wasteful projects.
When I worked for a fortune 20 company, we had a major, irrational push away from python into Microsoft Power Automate. Other people were convinced either our director was a Microsoft plant, or was getting some sort of kickback.
Here is my question:
What is the business called where people do this? Like if these companies paid a third party, what is this categorized as? (For instance, paying for reddit upvotes and comments is called 'Reputation Management')
- zb3 9mo agoBut at least it seems we have powerful Linux plants at Microsoft, they're doing great :)
- burningChrome 9mo agoCo‑opetition? Some have used the term "Strategic accommodation". Interesting you bring this specific Mozilla/Google example up since this is the closet thing to seeing this happen in real time: https://www.opensourceforu.com/2025/09/court-ruling-secures-google-payments-that-safeguard-firefox-and-open-source-ecosystem/ https://www.opensourceforu.com/2025/09/court-ruling-secures-... "Courts and press have noted that Mozilla relies heavily on Google’s search‑default payments, which keep Firefox viable. Recent antitrust proceedings have wrestled with whether (and how) to restrict these payments: a judge ultimately allowed Google to continue non‑exclusive payments to distribution partners like Mozilla while barring exclusivity and some tying/bundling—an outcome many observers said preserved Mozilla’s “lifeline” without materially threatening Google’s core position. That is textbook co‑opetition coupled with what many would call strategic accommodation."