2 ms·
Along that line I would rather all the parts be identical for all years of a make/model of a vehicle. Simplify EV's to be just slightly more complex than a gol
by Bender 10mo ago
Along that line I would rather all the parts be identical for all years of a make/model of a vehicle. Simplify EV's to be just slightly more complex than a golf cart and this should be doable. Or for that matter make all parts for all cars identical and the only difference could be the comfy part of the interior. I'm just trying to make Edward Bernays roll over in his grave so that his uncle Sigmund Freud can giggle in his grave.
If we can not support a car for 20+ years then the car must not cost more than $1599.99 and that price must not increase until the year 2150. What should set cars apart now should be how fast they can fly.
- stetrain 10mo agoYou can buy parts for most cars that are 20+ years old without issue. Refusing to improve or update the design of the vehicle and all of its parts forever isn't necessary to achieve that goal.
- Bender 10mo agoThat's just it. The first cars were designed to be reliable for 50+ years, then Edward came along and cars were about sex appeal and other things not required for a car. I have not seen many real improvements to cars. Quite the opposite, they are full of crap that can break that was never needed in the first place. Keep it simple and keep it just a car. We can keep the air bags though, that was an improvement. Engine efficiency design has gone backwards since the 1940's. There were cars designed to get 20mpg which does not sound great but they were almost 5000 pounds. The creator was assassinated for making it. Had we continued down that line we would have low emission and highly efficient engines without the bogus smog gear that could likely get 120+mpg and could outrun a Tesla S with all the mods. People just don't know what they are missing.