3 ms·
I've lived in and visted many other cities in Europe. Public transport is often much cheaper than London, but there's few examples where I'd really say it was /
by matt-p 9mo ago
I've lived in and visted many other cities in Europe. Public transport is often much cheaper than London, but there's few examples where I'd really say it was /better/. Can you think of an example?
- Beretta_Vexee 9mo agoOslo and Madrid come to mind. For the worst than london, The Rome underground is so sparse, it not really usefull. Paris is dense, chaotic and overcrowded.
- matt-p 9mo agoEvery single time I've been in Madrid the metro has been on strike. Every time. They run about 50-60% of services which means everything is slow and packed. I would actually say it's one of the worst in europe in my (I guess limited) experience due to that. I will have to try Oslo!
- 4ndrewl 9mo agoOk, Oslo would be a small city in the UK - London has 12x the population. Madrid is closer. Paris is great - the ride is very smooth.
- storus 9mo agoAnywhere in Germany? E.g. Frankfurt has much higher density of subway lines and trams.
- walthamstow 9mo agoOf course the transport is good in most DE cities but seriously, Frankfurt is a village compared to London. London's network is both vast and dense.
- matt-p 9mo agoFrankfurt is less than a tenth the size, I'm not sure it's really a comparison. I found Berlin to be no better/slightly worse.