I don't think 99% of the best is a good metric. It is highly dependent on what the best represents. If you had a 100% chance of not breaking your arm on any g

I don't think 99% of the best is a good metric. It is highly dependent on what the best represents. If you had a 100% chance of not breaking your arm on any given day, what kind of value would you place on it over a 99% chance on any given day. I would imagine it to be pretty high. The top models are not perfect, so they don't really represent 100% of anything on any scale. If the best you could do is have a 99% chance of not breaking your arm on any given day, then perhaps you might be more stoic about something that is 99% of 99% Which is close enough to 98% that you are 'only' going to double the number of broken arms you get in a year. I suspect using AI in production will be a calculated more as likelihood of pain than increased widgets per hour. Recovery from disaster can eat any productivity gains easily.