> That is a very long time for this technology at it's current rate of development. Yes, as long as that gap stays consistent, there is no problem with buildin

> That is a very long time for this technology at it's current rate of development. Yes, as long as that gap stays consistent, there is no problem with building on ~9 months old tech from a business perspective. Heck, many companies are lagging behind tech advancements by decades and are doing fine.