2 ms·
> True, but no more true than it is if you replace the antecedent with "people". Incorrect. People are capable of learning by observation, introspection, and
by solid_fuel 9mo ago
> True, but no more true than it is if you replace the antecedent with "people".
Incorrect. People are capable of learning by observation, introspection, and reasoning. LLMs can only be trained by rote example.
Hallucinations are, in fact, an unavoidable property of the technology - something which is not true for people. [0]
[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11817 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11817
- CamperBob2 9mo agoWhat you (and the authors) call "hallucination," other people call "imagination." Also, you don't know very many people, including yourself, if you think that confabulation and self-deception aren't integral parts of our core psychological makeup. LLMs work so well because they inherit not just our logical thinking patterns, but our faults and fallacies.
- blibble 9mo agowhat I call it is "buggy garbage" it's not a person, it doesn't hallucinate or have imagination it's simply unreliable software, riddled with bugs
- CamperBob2 9mo ago(Shrug) Perhaps other sites beckon.
- TheOtherHobbes 9mo agoThe suggestion that hallucinations are avoidable in humans is quite a bold claim.