2 ms·
The end game is nationalisation lmao. How people cant see this is mad... It wouldnt be the first time in history a govt has taken into their hands an organisat
by ef2efe 8mo ago
The end game is nationalisation lmao. How people cant see this is mad...
It wouldnt be the first time in history a govt has taken into their hands an organisation that is deemed too powerful.
- funkyfiddler369 8mo agoif the government is owned by corporations via the stock markets than governments taking over organisations is privatization via a majority shareholdership and not nationalization.
- ef2efe 8mo agoAre you seriously this delusional? THe leaders of tech firms operate at the behest of Trump. Not the other way round.
- mannanj 8mo agoWho funds those tech firms? It's not Trump. His power is mostly theater to his constituents and those who funded Trump: spoiler: he's not entirely self funded, and some of his funding is at least from others so he's conflicted in his self interests to others. We call this a classic conflict of interest.
- funkyfiddler369 8mo agoHow did Trump get where he is? Who was and is his supply chain? Who made him? Who did he 'use' and 'need' to 'build himself'?
- mannanj 8mo agoYeah I can see that. Though the separation between "govenrment" and "corporation" is pretty thin already. So nationalization or corporitization, whatever you want to call it, its just a label for rich and powerful people concentrating power and deriving benefits.