3 ms·
I realize dang has already tagged this (and I get it) but I don’t know who is actually benefiting from this. This is deceptive as it doesn’t represent a travele
by linkjuice4all 9mo ago
I realize dang has already tagged this (and I get it) but I don’t know who is actually benefiting from this. This is deceptive as it doesn’t represent a traveler’s actual/expected experience and just adds more slop to the pile. This is a case where you should pay actual photographers to take verified pictures of the places you are recommending people visit. Why would someone cheapen their brand like this?
- properbrew 9mo agoIf you read the article you'll see it's not about generating AI slop images: > Take a freeform query (like ‘sfo->jfk’) and turn it into a ‘place’ > Build a database of ‘places’ -> pictures > Build a software system that can take a ‘place’, look it up in a database and spit out the right picture – even if that ‘place’ isn’t in the database