3 ms·
Here was the OP's claim: > if you are a big online retailer in a country, you will have a big corporate presence in that country. They made a general claim th
by ericmay 9mo ago
Here was the OP's claim:
> if you are a big online retailer in a country, you will have a big corporate presence in that country.
They made a general claim that a big retailer in a country will have a big corporate presence in that country. I don't know if that's true or not - hence my response.
They didn't claim that a big retailer in India will have a big corporate presence, nor did claim that a retailer approaching 35% of e-commerce must have a large corporate presence in the country. It was an ambiguous claim, which is why I asked a few follow up questions.
> You’re making claims yourself, so I’d like to see examples of companies that operate at that scale in a country without corporate presence.
I didn't make this claim so there's nothing for me to provide.
- darth_avocado 9mo agoHere’s the claim you made: because in my mind there are a number of large online retailers that operate in the United States for example, without a large corporate presence here.
- ericmay 9mo agoThat was commentary on the poor format of the arguments that were made by the OP and you. It's not a "claim". But sure, if you insist, Temu is a large online retailer that operates in the United States without a large corporate presence here. QED.
- oblio 9mo agoPlaces like Temu are the exception and they should be banned. Garbage dumpers.