4 ms·
Very impressive. It reminded me of a demo from Adobe at MAX 2011 that showed promising results; it was more focused on eliminating defects from real images to p
by planckscnst 14y ago
Very impressive. It reminded me of a demo from Adobe at MAX 2011 that showed promising results; it was more focused on eliminating defects from real images to produce a more aesthetic result. http://youtu.be/xxjiQoTp864 http://youtu.be/xxjiQoTp864
- larrybolt 14y agoI've been looking for this kind of software a while ago, and the best I found was this one: https://www.blurity.com/ https://www.blurity.com/ And other program I'be heard but haven't tried before is UnShake: http://www.zen147963.zen.co.uk/Unshake/ http://www.zen147963.zen.co.uk/Unshake/ It seems that if the blur is caused by moving the camera you can try to find the direction the movement happend and restore the original photograph quite nicely afterwards.
- stan_rogers 14y agoTopaz Labs has had a Photoshop plugin out for some time now (InFocus) that does the same thing. It cuts off at a fairly low blur radius, though, since it's intended for photo correction rather than forensic retrieval, and ringing can get pretty severe even at a small pixel radius. What sets the Adobe tool apart from the rest (so far) is that you can define a non-linear path for motion blur. From what was said at the demo, there seems to be some hope for automatically determining a non-linear motion path. That would be really cool.
- teuobk 14y agoBlurity author here. I'm happy to say that Blurity does exactly what you're requesting in your second paragraph: it can "automatically determine a non-linear motion path" using true blind deconvolution. Although Blurity is a commercial product, the watermarked trial is free. I'd be curious to hear your reactions.