2 ms·

Thanks — that’s exactly our motivation. The key shift for us was moving from “did the agent probably do the right thing?” to “can we prove the state we expected

by tonyww 8mo ago

Thanks — that’s exactly our motivation. The key shift for us was moving from “did the agent probably do the right thing?” to “can we prove the state we expected actually holds.” The property-based testing analogy is a good one — once you make success explicit, failures become actionable instead of mysterious.

joeframbach 8mo ago
You realize you are responding to a brand new account posting an obviously AI-generated response?
- tonyww 8mo ago
  I’m absolutely not AI, I dedicate this morning to technical discussion with HN community on my post, which I’ve spent weeks building the technology behind it
  - joeframbach 8mo ago
    [flagged]