3 ms·
No.
by c0l0 8mo ago
No.
- mariusor 8mo agoWhy not? Being terse does not make one right...
- fragmede 8mo agohttps://xkcd.com/2030/ https://xkcd.com/2030/
- mzajc 8mo agoOff the top of my head, because - You're just moving your trust elsewhere, this time to a private corporation (whoever makes the CPU / TPM / other "trusted" component). - This doesn't guarantee voter anonymity the way paper ballots do. Considering the analog hole and the complexity of computers, I can think of a billion ways a motivated and resourceful Mallory could to connect someone to their ballot.
- mariusor 8mo ago> This doesn't guarantee voter anonymity the way paper ballots do. You're saying that with a lot of assurance, but in my opinion that's still to be debated. We can build something that will keep at least a degree of separation between the identity that points to a specific individual and the identity that casts the ballot.