4 ms·

No. Just that every where I look these days there is an article about Iran. Every next day there is some new article about Iran doing something. And when it isn

No. Just that every where I look these days there is an article about Iran. Every next day there is some new article about Iran doing something. And when it isn't then there are articles like these - dug up from the history to fill some new Iran related news. I am scared if this is a precursor to a new war. It looks awfully similar to the last time. (Btw, I am an Indian in India who has got nothing to do with USA and Iran.)

kghose 14y ago
Actually, having lived in India for a while in the 90s I can tell you that (if you lived in India at that time) you are likely to be more biased against the US (and other NATO powers) and more biased towards Russia and the Arab states. India was "non-aligned" during the cold war but was fairly tilted towards the USSR (cheap munitions, convenient ideology) and this was conveyed through the strongly controlled media. Due to the size and volatility of the Muslim population in India there were many moves to appear (and push people to appear) allied with the Arab states and against Israel. I wonder what, in general, the modern viewpoint is. Young people in India now are more into consumer goods and I think less political than they were 20 years ago, but I only get brief snapshots now.
- user9756 14y ago
  Funny, the same can be said of people living in the US and US allies. The west has a very "strongly controlled media" too, and the message being sent is quite clear.
  - kghose 14y ago
    I'm sure you can have the opinion that media in North America and Western Europe is very strongly controlled, but it is a fact that mass media (Television and radio, though not newspapers) in India up to the end of the 90s were state controlled. After liberalization in the late 90s private television stations opened up.
    - user9756 14y ago
      I didn't question the history of media in India. I only pointed out that there is "blind spot" in discussing "free media".
- jebblue 14y ago
  >> Actually, having lived in India for a while in the 90s I can tell you that (if you lived in India at that time) you are likely to be more biased against the US (and other NATO powers) and more biased towards Russia and the Arab states. Then can someone tell the hordes of Indians getting into the US since the 90's they were/are somehow confused and need to change direction towards Russia and India. Thanks!
  - kghose 14y ago
    There was a program where people in certain sectors went to the USSR to get educated. It wasn't very big. Also, I have found, people are fairly pragmatic politics is politics and business is business. Indians come to the US because they have an infrastructure here (established Indians) and job opportunities, neither of which exist in scale in the USSR.
Xylakant 14y ago
Actually, if you have a look at the date this article was written in 2007. So it's certainly not part of any concerted effort to make Iran look bad or a precursor to a new war.
ajays 14y ago
This article was probably dug up because the movie Argo just came out.

kghose 14y ago

Actually, having lived in India for a while in the 90s I can tell you that (if you lived in India at that time) you are likely to be more biased against the US (and other NATO powers) and more biased towards Russia and the Arab states. India was "non-aligned" during the cold war but was fairly tilted towards the USSR (cheap munitions, convenient ideology) and this was conveyed through the strongly controlled media. Due to the size and volatility of the Muslim population in India there were many moves to appear (and push people to appear) allied with the Arab states and against Israel. I wonder what, in general, the modern viewpoint is. Young people in India now are more into consumer goods and I think less political than they were 20 years ago, but I only get brief snapshots now.

user9756 14y ago
Funny, the same can be said of people living in the US and US allies. The west has a very "strongly controlled media" too, and the message being sent is quite clear.
- kghose 14y ago
  I'm sure you can have the opinion that media in North America and Western Europe is very strongly controlled, but it is a fact that mass media (Television and radio, though not newspapers) in India up to the end of the 90s were state controlled. After liberalization in the late 90s private television stations opened up.
  - user9756 14y ago
    I didn't question the history of media in India. I only pointed out that there is "blind spot" in discussing "free media".
jebblue 14y ago
>> Actually, having lived in India for a while in the 90s I can tell you that (if you lived in India at that time) you are likely to be more biased against the US (and other NATO powers) and more biased towards Russia and the Arab states. Then can someone tell the hordes of Indians getting into the US since the 90's they were/are somehow confused and need to change direction towards Russia and India. Thanks!
- kghose 14y ago
  There was a program where people in certain sectors went to the USSR to get educated. It wasn't very big. Also, I have found, people are fairly pragmatic politics is politics and business is business. Indians come to the US because they have an infrastructure here (established Indians) and job opportunities, neither of which exist in scale in the USSR.

Xylakant 14y ago

Actually, if you have a look at the date this article was written in 2007. So it's certainly not part of any concerted effort to make Iran look bad or a precursor to a new war.

ajays 14y ago

This article was probably dug up because the movie Argo just came out.