3 ms·
Neither is showing up to a bank with a gun. Yet a robbery is likely to have much more severe consequences if you are armed.
by account42 10mo ago
Neither is showing up to a bank with a gun. Yet a robbery is likely to have much more severe consequences if you are armed.
- kreetx 10mo agoIt's funny how people use the lawfulness argument for carrying a gun to protest, but don't use the same argument against deporting illegals.
- donkeybeer 10mo agoNobody is stopping illegals from being deported. They just hace to prove illegality first. If you believe otherwise, I am more than happy to recommend you for imprisonment and deportation first before asking questions.
- kreetx 10mo agoIt's already proven as they are following through a court order. As far as I know, they are also first and foremost deporting illegals who are criminals to begin with.
- donkeybeer 10mo agoAre you sure? Give me the numbers of how many are actual real court orders and how many are internal "warrants".
- kreetx 10mo agoWarrants are legally not meant to be followed?
- donkeybeer 10mo agoNot all warrants are same. Some warrants ICE use don't have legal powers of court issued warrants for example. So yes, its just a piece of nosy Karen paper and you can prevent them entry to your house for example for certain types of warrants.
- kreetx 10mo agoWas this particular warrant like that?
- donkeybeer 10mo agoWhat warrant it was has no bearing in whether he, not an individual related to any immigration case being investigated has the right to film it. Most of the warrants being used in the minnesota botch job are the Karen warrants from what can be found anyways.
- kreetx 10mo agoI'm sure an investigation into this particular case will surface what kind of warrant (or other legal document) they were carrying out and whether whistling along with police carrying out their work was interference or not. If you know who was going to be captured and how this was only a "Karen" warrant , which doesn't constitute non-interferable police work, post to any source!
- donkeybeer 10mo agoYou seem to have difficulty with English, maybe its not your main language. What part of the warrant type being immaterial for third parties having a right to film the cops was difficult to understand?
- kreetx 9mo agoWhy do you say "not all warrants are the same" while them being different is immaterial? Also, why even "protest" at these events when the people targeted by ICE haven't determined to be illegal immigrants? They can just present their basis for legal immigration and be done with it.
- donkeybeer 10mo agoA banks not public property and the people being shot weren't engaging in any crime. A bank can decide what they allow in or not. Its extremely astounding you seem unaware of this. Your "analogy" is completely confused and meaningless.
- kreetx 10mo agoThe parent is just exemplifying how in specific situations having a gun with you drastically changes how you are perceived.
- donkeybeer 10mo agoNo, it's a completely absurd analogy that doesn't even begin to make sense.
- kreetx 9mo agoIt does: in context of an active war having a gun won't surprise anyone. In context of arresting someone and seeing a gun on that person makes that person appear lethally dangerous.
- donkeybeer 9mo agoWhy? If you are arrested for a parking ticket do you expect to be shot if you also happened to be carrying? It's understandable if one feels scared of someone wielding a firearm while confronting them. Therefore we should shoot any cops who attempt to come near us since they are armed and getting into an interaction with us and they appear lethally dangerous.