3 ms·
Do you not experience LLM generated code constantly trying to use Pandas' methods/syntax for Polars objects?
by gHA5 8mo ago
Do you not experience LLM generated code constantly trying to use Pandas' methods/syntax for Polars objects?
- postalcoder 8mo agoThere were some growing pains in gpt-3.5 to gpt-4 era, but not nowadays (shoutout to the now-defunct Phind, which was a game changer back then).
- crimsoneer 8mo agoThe fact they pivoted away from their very compelling core offering (AI stack overflow) to complete with loveable etc in the "AI generated apps" giant fight continues to baffle me. Though I guess model updates ate their lunch.
- postalcoder 8mo agoMy guess is that their pivot came after distress, and was not the cause of it. It'd be great to have @rushingcreek write a post-mortem. I think it'd benefit a lot of people because I honestly don't have a monday morning playbook of what could have saved them. Like you said, perhaps the demise of phind was inevitable, with large models displacing them kind of like how Spotify displaced music piracy.
- edschofield 8mo agoYes, ChatGPT 5.2 Pro absolutely still does this. Just ask it for a pivot table using Polars and it will probably spit out code with Pandas arguments that doesn’t work.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]