6 ms·
This to me is the point.. LLMs can't be responsible for things. It sits with a human.
by draxil 8mo ago
This to me is the point.. LLMs can't be responsible for things. It sits with a human.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- taylorius 8mo agoWhy can LLMs not be responsible for things? (genuine question - I'm not certain myself).
- pvab3 8mo agobecause it doesn't have any skin in the game and can't be punished, and can't be rewarded for succeeding. Its reputation, career, and dignity are nonexistent.
- direwolf20 8mo agoThis doesn't seem to have stopped anyone before.
- pvab3 8mo agoStopped anyone from doing what? Assigning responsibility to someone with nothing to lose, no dignity or pride, and immune from financial or social injury?
- taylorius 8mo agoOn the contrary - the LLM has had it's own version of "skin in the game" through the whole of it's training. Reinforcement learning is nothing but that. Why is that less real than putting a person in prison. Is it because of the LLM itself, or because you don't trust the people selling it to you?
- oblio 8mo agoAre you claiming that LLMs are... sentient? Bold claim, Taylor.