>the meaning of multi-words isn't the result of structure or word order Surely the 'word order' part must be a mistake here? Clearly word order influences the

>the meaning of multi-words isn't the result of structure or word order Surely the 'word order' part must be a mistake here? Clearly word order influences the interpretation of sequences of English words. As for structure, the paper presents no evidence whatever that structure is not involved in the interpretation. >many idioms for example aren't interpreted literally This is just the definition of what an idiom is, not any kind of insight.