"no explanation in sight"? - we don't know how life originated , but it's hardly some great mystery as to the kind of way might have happened. There's a number

"no explanation in sight"? - we don't know how life originated , but it's hardly some great mystery as to the kind of way might have happened. There's a number of theories about the kinds of ways it could have happened. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis > just as it's as easy to dismiss supernatural explanations just because they're supernatural (although metaphysically plausible) Why are you suggesting that being "metaphysically plausible" means they shouldn't be dismissed? > just how hard the scientific community is trying to find a very particular kind of explanation in order to dismiss others I'm going to call you out on that and say that it is ridiculous to suggest that the scientific community is working on certain kinds of explanations in order to dismiss others.